LETTER: Public must step up efforts to save Saanich park

I was perhaps a wee harsh on the Parks Department in my last letter –“Mount Doug Park subject to benighted neglect” – because there’s another culprit with responsibility for the deterioration of the park.

In my preceding letter, I described the difference in management of the park and the Gordon Head Rec Centre. The first suffers a “light touch” management model, whereas the latter has a full panoply of staff and funding. To emphasize the difference, I queried what would happen to the rec centre if it was run like the park. The answer: likely rapid deterioration of programs and plant and equipment. At that point, I stopped too soon. I should have asked the further question: what would the users do in response to a severe change in management style at the rec centre.

My belief is there’d be a major revolt by users: petitions galore; letters to the editor swamping Saanich News, council meetings full to the brim with angry residents. And council were very likely make changes, just like they did under pressure at the Cedar Hill Rec Centre with the private tennis court proposal.

Now, let’s compare their response to that of park user’s to the ongoing degradation of their park. Truly, silence is golden.

The question then raises the issue of why the probable difference between rec centre and park users. Perhaps, the former are more militant as they push their weights, swim, etc.; kind of Type A personality types. Whereas the latter are more passive, nature loving, stroll-in-the-park, don’t rock-the-boat individuals.

So, the next time you use the park and you notice the sand washing down on Whittaker or the severe erosion of the little Mt. Doug lookout trail, be sure to feel a twinge of wonder, and then move quickly on to enjoy the rest of your walk.

And the next morning, when you look in the mirror, think for a quick sec that the problems of the park are directly traceable back that culprit reflected in the mirror – you. There alone final lesson to be learned here. It’s axiomatic (I’ve learned from hard experience) that if you don’t really care, the council doesn’t care. And if council doesn’t care, the departments don’t care. There is a bit of silver lining, though, about resident passivity. Councillors and staff get to sleep much better at night without the controversy.

Dave Poje


Just Posted

Celebrating the heroic dogs of Saanich past

Cedar Hill exhibit features great dogs of history

Crash at Tillicum Centre breaks traffic signal

Emergency crews on scene, avoid the area

Victoria council denies 44-unit building after tie vote

Proposed rental development on Burdett Avenue divides City and residents

Adopted pet pig gets killed and eaten

Animal was adopted out by SPCA staff in the Cowichan Valley

Therapy dogs make appearance at B.C. Games

The St. John’s Ambulance therapy dog program launches a pilot project at the 2018 Kamloops B.C. Winter Games

Saanich councillors spar over financial transparency

As Saanich council prepares to hold its inaugural 2018 budget meeting next… Continue reading

Canucks fold 5-3 in first ever trip to Vegas

Daniel Sedin had two points as Canucks fall to the Golden Knights Friday night

That’s a wrap: B.C. Games results after Day 1

Vancouver-Coastal Zone 5 is in the lead for medals Friday at the Kamloops 2018 B.C. Winter Games

Sticking the landing at the B.C. Games

Gymnasts talk competition, B.C. Winter Games, and teamwork in Kamloops

$153M in federal cash to fund child care, education training in B.C.

Bilateral agreement will create 1,370 new infant and toddler spaces

A B.C. woman talks her life in the sex trade

A view into the life from one Kelowna prostitute and the issues it can cause for women

Twitter feed prays for — instead of preying on — B.C. MLAs

Non-partisan Christian group wants to support politicians through personalized prayer

BC Ferries report net loss of $14.8 million in third quarter

CEO assures public it’s smooth sailing, advises of new ‘fare initiatives’

Most Read