EDPA bylaw should be far less difficult to navigate

I want to congratulate the five members of council who voted in favour of removing the Rainbow Street properties from the EDPA

Firstly, I want to congratulate the five members of council who voted in favour of removing the Rainbow Street properties from the EDPA. Having sat through every meeting and town hall on the EDPA, this was the only possible conclusion to the saga, based on the wording of the bylaw and the fact that the applicants met its criteria for removal.

I also want to correct some misinformation made both in your paper and by Coun. Brownoff, about statements made at council by the public, specifically, myself.

When addressing council I expressed concern that they had been doing policy development on the fly.  To be clear, this was in respect, not of the EDPA, but of the matter of policy issues on tree protection. That is because at the previous council meeting dealing with this matter, a majority had chosen, with no apparent statutory or legal support, to move a motion stating they would only consider removal of the properties from the EDPA if the owners would, in some unstated, unclear way, provide guarantees around protection of the Garry oaks, beyond that provided in the current tree bylaw.  I pointed out that if there are issues with the tree bylaw, they should deal with that on a global basis, in a thorough and publicly debated review, not by trying to develop policy on the fly in respect of one property.

Clearly a majority of councillors agreed with me and others who made the same point. In moving the motion to remove the properties with no restriction, Coun. Plant noted that they probably had no authority to restrict the owners in this way, and that the owners had met the conditions for removal under the bylaw. The other four echoed those remarks in various ways.

I trust that this does, in fact, mean that any owner who meets the conditions in section 14 of the bylaw will be removed from the EDPA.  The bylaw, according to councillors at the meeting, was meant to be far less difficult to navigate than it has turned out to be. Here’s hoping.

Karen Harper

 

Saanich

 

 

Just Posted

Studies for E&N corridor still on track after BC Transit investments

Recent investment in bus fleet expansion doesn’t slow studies into alternative transportation routes

Two brands of ice cream sandwiches recalled due to presence of metal

The Canadian Food Inspection Agency issued a recall on Iceberg and Originale Augustin brands

Single parent resource centre continues operations in partially-condemned building

Victoria’s 1Up Single Parent Resource Centre moves back into heritage home

Townhouses on the rise in popularity in Greater Victoria

A report finds 152 townhouse units in the construction pipeline and coming onto market in 2020.

WATCH: Residents flock to 32nd annual Moss Street paint-in

More than 190 artists took over Moss Street for Saturday event

Sexual assaults, extortion on the rise even as crime rates stay low: Stats Canada

Rates of police-reported sexual assault rose for the fourth year in a row

Vancouver Island teens missing after vehicle found ablaze near Dease Lake, BC

RCMP say a body discovered nearby not one of the missing teens

A year later, ceremony commemorates victims of the Danforth shooting

It’s the one-year anniversary of when a man opened fire along the bustling street before shooting and killing himself

Japanese Canadians call on B.C. to go beyond mere apology for historic racism

The federal government apologized in 1988 for its racism against ‘enemy aliens’

B.C. VIEWS: NDP pushes ahead with Crown forest redistribution

This isn’t the time for a radical Indigenous rights agenda

Two dead in two-vehicle crash between Revelstoke and Golden

RCMP are investigating the cause of the crash

Ottawa fights planned class action against RCMP for bullying, intimidation

The current case is more general, applying to employees, including men, who worked for the RCMP

Most Read