Project carries costs

This permanent loss of potential for anything other than water storage for another generating station is bad enough

The writer of the letter “Food for thought” (Jan. 8) appears to suffer from the same shortsighted vision of the future as does our premier and her  government’s decision makers. He may well be correct in his views about the agricultural potential of the Peace River valley as it exists today and has historically been the case.

However, it appears that no one has given much thought to the possibility of its year round viability in the future. California has been a major contributor to the world’s breadbasket for decades but its ability to continue in that capacity is being eroded by drought and the depletion of its groundwater. The changes to weather patterns around the world suggest the status quo is no longer relevant.

Unlike those paying lip service to the issue of climate change by proclaiming to the world how B.C. is in the vanguard of efforts to reduce its carbon footprint, anyone truly concerned about the phenomenon would be looking beyond next week or next year.

This permanent loss of potential for anything other than water storage for another generating station is bad enough on its own but only adds to the frivolity of this government’s bull-headed determination to proceed.

The sole justification for Site C that stands up to scrutiny is to generate the power required to super-cool natural gas to its liquid form so that our government can keep the promises that got them elected – to provide B.C. with thousands of jobs and billions of dollars in revenues. If natural gas is seen as the interim environmental saviour of the planet why not use it for the power required rather than put the expense on the shoulders of the taxpayer? But the construction is not the only cost associated with this mega project.

B.C. is lagging well behind other developers of LNG worldwide so what is the probability that the net benefit to our economy will be what has been suggested? What is the likelihood that the cost of Site C will be on or under budget? We have pie-in-the-sky proposals by a government that shares a bed with big business at the expense of the taxpayer and the environment. We need to wake up and do something about it.

Dave Fowler

Saanich

 

Get local stories you won't find anywhere else right to your inbox.
Sign up here

Just Posted

Saanich mayor signs up for mason bee rental service

Fred Haynes rents mason bee colony from Oyster River beekeeper for his Prospect Lake home

Occupancy rates remain above capacity in Greater Victoria hospitals

Region’s hospitals have more patients than acute care beds

‘Clever’ 90-year-old Saanich resident evades vitamin phone scammer

Police warn of phone scammers claiming to be from the Regional Health Authority

VIDEO: Rare ‘ice circle’ spotted on Kamloops river

An ice circle or ice pan, has formed in the chilly waters just east of the Yellowhead Bridge

Greater Victoria Crime Stoppers wanted list for the week of Jan. 21

Greater Victoria Crime Stoppers is seeking the public’s help in locating the… Continue reading

Uber, Lyft approved for ride-hailing in Lower Mainland

Kater Technologies Inc.’s application was rejected

Investigators in wildfire-torn Australia head to site of B.C. airtanker crash

The B.C. government sends condolences to Port Alberni-owned Coulson Aviation

Former Mountie, sports coach convicted of sex abuse in B.C. granted day parole

Alan Davidson was sentenced to almost six years for abusing seven boys in the late 1970s and early 1990s

VIDEO: Person in wheelchair narrowly avoids collision with car in Kelowna

There were no injuries in the scary looking near-accident last week in Rutland

Here’s what Canada is doing to stop the coronavirus from getting in

Health officials are monitoring multiple possible cases in Canada

B.C. still struggling to control non-resident medical care fraud

Unpaid bills, out-of-province claimants a costly legacy of MSP

Most Read