Project carries costs

This permanent loss of potential for anything other than water storage for another generating station is bad enough

The writer of the letter “Food for thought” (Jan. 8) appears to suffer from the same shortsighted vision of the future as does our premier and her  government’s decision makers. He may well be correct in his views about the agricultural potential of the Peace River valley as it exists today and has historically been the case.

However, it appears that no one has given much thought to the possibility of its year round viability in the future. California has been a major contributor to the world’s breadbasket for decades but its ability to continue in that capacity is being eroded by drought and the depletion of its groundwater. The changes to weather patterns around the world suggest the status quo is no longer relevant.

Unlike those paying lip service to the issue of climate change by proclaiming to the world how B.C. is in the vanguard of efforts to reduce its carbon footprint, anyone truly concerned about the phenomenon would be looking beyond next week or next year.

This permanent loss of potential for anything other than water storage for another generating station is bad enough on its own but only adds to the frivolity of this government’s bull-headed determination to proceed.

The sole justification for Site C that stands up to scrutiny is to generate the power required to super-cool natural gas to its liquid form so that our government can keep the promises that got them elected – to provide B.C. with thousands of jobs and billions of dollars in revenues. If natural gas is seen as the interim environmental saviour of the planet why not use it for the power required rather than put the expense on the shoulders of the taxpayer? But the construction is not the only cost associated with this mega project.

B.C. is lagging well behind other developers of LNG worldwide so what is the probability that the net benefit to our economy will be what has been suggested? What is the likelihood that the cost of Site C will be on or under budget? We have pie-in-the-sky proposals by a government that shares a bed with big business at the expense of the taxpayer and the environment. We need to wake up and do something about it.

Dave Fowler

Saanich

 

Just Posted

‘More animals could have a chance:’ Victoria Humane Society in desperate need of a home

Animal rescue currently has 163 animals in foster and volunteer homes

Free-B Film Festival celebrates 20th anniversary

Head to Victoria’s Beacon Hill Park to see some family favourites on the big screen

Central Saanich accused of not following Climate Emergency declaration with urgent action

Motion to research climate response options and costs rejected then rescheduled in tense meeting

Join North Saanich invasives removal and experience three key benefits

Friends of North Saanich Parks says July 27 clear-up will be rewarding as well as green

Esquimalt gives six-storey rental complex the green light

A new apartment building is set to go up on Admirals Road

Rich the Vegan scoots across Canada for the animals

Rich Adams is riding his push scooter across Canada to bring awareness to the dog meat trade in Asia

A year later, ceremony commemorates victims of the Danforth shooting

It’s the one-year anniversary of when a man opened fire along the bustling street before shooting and killing himself

Japanese Canadians call on B.C. to go beyond mere apology for historic racism

The federal government apologized in 1988 for its racism against ‘enemy aliens’

B.C. VIEWS: NDP pushes ahead with Crown forest redistribution

This isn’t the time for a radical Indigenous rights agenda

Two dead in two-vehicle crash between Revelstoke and Golden

RCMP are investigating the cause of the crash

Ottawa fights planned class action against RCMP for bullying, intimidation

The current case is more general, applying to employees, including men, who worked for the RCMP

Alberta judge denies B.C.’s bid to block ‘Turn Off the Taps’ bill

He said the proper venue for the disagreement is Federal Court

Most Read